The Great Assets
  • Business
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • Business
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Investing

The Great Assets

Politics

IG finds Hegseth’s use of Signal for Houthi strike planning risked harm to US mission and pilots, sources say

by admin December 4, 2025
December 4, 2025
IG finds Hegseth’s use of Signal for Houthi strike planning risked harm to US mission and pilots, sources say

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth ‘created risks to operational security’ by sharing sensitive details about Houthi strikes over Signal, a new Pentagon inspector general report determined, according to sources familiar with the report. 

His actions ‘could have resulted in failed US mission objectives and potential harm to US pilots,’ one source familiar with the report said. 

Fox News has reached out to the Pentagon for comment. 

A classified version of the report has been handed over to the Senate Armed Services Committee and is available for members of the committee to view. An unclassified, redacted version will be made public on Thursday. 

Trump administration officials used Signal to discuss sensitive military strikes against the Houthis in Yemen in March. Then-national security advisor Mike Waltz had created the chat, which included many of Trump’s top Cabinet members, and inadvertently added Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of the Atlantic.

The IG launched a probe in April following requests from top lawmakers on Capitol Hill. It was intended to examine whether Secretary Pete Hegseth improperly discussed operational plans for a U.S. offensive against the Houthis in Yemen and will also review ‘compliance with classification and records retention requirements,’ according to a memo from Inspector General Steven Stebbins.

Hegseth’s Signal messages revealed F-18, Navy fighter aircraft, MQ-9s, drones and Tomahawks cruise missiles would be used in the strike on the Houthis.

‘1215et: F-18s LAUNCH (1st strike package),’ Hegseth said in one message notifying the chat of high-level administration officials that the attack was about to kick off.

‘1345: ‘Trigger Based’ F-18 1st Strike Window Starts (Target Terrorist is @ his Known Location so SHOULD BE ON TIME – also, Strike Drones Launch (MQ-9s),’ he added, according to the report.

‘1410: More F-18s LAUNCH (2nd strike package)’

‘1415: Strike Drones on Target (THIS IS WHEN THE FIRST BOMBS WILL DEFINITELY DROP, pending earlier ‘Trigger Based’ targets)’

‘1536 F-18 2nd Strike Starts – also, first sea-based Tomahawks launched.’

‘MORE TO FOLLOW (per timeline)’

‘We are currently clean on OPSEC’ — that is, operational security.

Waltz later wrote that the mission had been successful. ‘The first target — their top missile guy — was positively ID’d walking into his girlfriend’s building. It’s now collapsed.’

Trump administration officials have insisted that nothing classified was shared over the chat. The report should offer clarity on that claim.

Thursday will be a contentious day for the Pentagon — Adm. Frank M. Bradley, commander of Special Operations Command, will also be on Capitol Hill to offer his account of the Sept. 2 ‘double tap’ strike on alleged narco-traffickers. 

After one strike on a boat carrying 11 people and allegedly carting drugs toward the U.S. left two survivors clinging to the wreckage, Bradley ordered another to take out the remaining smugglers.

Lawmakers and legal analysts have claimed that killing shipwrecked survivors is a war crime. Bradley is briefing leaders on the House and Senate Armed Services Committees. 

Original reporting by the Washington Post claimed that direction came from the top: Hegseth had directed the commander to ‘kill them all.’ But Hegseth claimed he issued no such directive and did not witness the second strike. He said Bradley made the decision on his own, but he stands by it. U.S. officials who spoke with the New York Times said Hegseth did not order the second strike.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
Epstein island compound seen in new photos released by House Dems
next post
Jack Smith subpoenaed for deposition with House Judiciary Committee

Related Posts

Zelenskyy says ire with Trump began with pro-Putin...

March 1, 2025

Top GOP lawmaker reveals most ‘significant challenge’ impacting...

September 26, 2025

Gorsuch warns Supreme Court decision gives IRS ‘powerful...

June 13, 2025

Gabbard says Comey should be ‘put behind bars’...

May 16, 2025

Hegseth to look into ‘what went wrong’ in...

February 8, 2025

Trump weighs striking Iranian nuclear facilities: ‘I may...

June 19, 2025

DOJ launching grand jury investigation into Russiagate conspiracy...

August 5, 2025

Gaza plan criticized by US and Israel gets...

March 9, 2025

SCOOP: House GOP eyes more Medicaid reforms in...

September 4, 2025

DOGE’s greatest hits: Look back at the department’s...

April 30, 2025

    Join our mailing list to get access to special deals, promotions, and insider information. Your exclusive benefits await! Enjoy personalized recommendations, first dibs on sales, and members-only content that makes you feel like a true VIP. Sign up now and start saving!


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Editors’ Picks

    • 1

      Top 11 Countries by Rare Earth Metal Production

      February 27, 2025
    • 2

      Top 10 Copper-producing Companies

      February 12, 2025
    • 3

      Uranium Stocks: 5 Biggest Companies in 2025

      May 20, 2025
    • 4

      Rare Earths Reserves: Top 8 Countries

      February 5, 2025
    • 5

      Capital One outage drags into Friday afternoon, leaving some customers without deposit access

      January 23, 2025
    • 6

      Bank of America CEO says financial industry will jump into crypto payments if regulators allow it

      January 23, 2025
    • 7

      Netflix shares soar as company reports surging revenue, tops 300 million subscribers

      January 23, 2025
    • About us
    • Contacts
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Email Whitelisting

    Disclaimer: thegreatassets.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2025 thegreatassets.com | All Rights Reserved