The Great Assets
  • Business
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • Business
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Investing

The Great Assets

Politics

Operation Epic Fury survives Senate challenge as Republicans close ranks behind Trump

by admin March 5, 2026
March 5, 2026
Operation Epic Fury survives Senate challenge as Republicans close ranks behind Trump

Senate Republicans closed ranks Wednesday, handing President Donald Trump a win on his use of force in Iran, despite lingering questions about America’s involvement in the Middle East.

The Senate shot down a resolution from Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., aimed at limiting Trump’s military actions in Iran on Wednesday, following days of speculation about whether Republicans would cross the aisle — as they have done before — to reprimand the president.

The administration pushed hard to lobby support for Operation Epic Fury, holding several briefings with Congress to make its case. It appeared to work, at least for now, convincing some Republicans on the fence to back continued military action in Iran.

Only Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., voted in favor of the resolution, while Sen. Jon Fetterman, D-Pa., was the lone Democrat to cross the aisle in support.

Democrats argued that Trump’s actions were another instance of him disregarding Congress’ authority to use military force, that they lacked a clear strategy going forward and, further, that they were yet another campaign promise he had broken.

‘It’s time for the president to keep promises, not break them,’ Kaine said ahead of the vote. ‘That’s why I’m so glad that we’re going to put everybody on the record … Nobody gets to hide and give the president an easy pass or an end run around the Constitution.’

Democrats also seized on the administration’s refusal to rule out sending U.S. troops into Iran.

‘They refuse to take off the table the insertion of ground troops,’ said Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., warning the conflict could expand beyond air and naval operations. ‘This is going to make the operations in Libya look like child’s play.’

Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., who previously supported a resolution to rein in Trump’s war powers in Venezuela, said he would oppose the latest effort.

But like last time, he said a ground operation would require congressional approval.

‘I’ve always said that committing ground troops would be something I think would require immediate congressional authorization, but that doesn’t appear to be on the immediate horizon,’ Hawley said.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., argued that the goalposts kept moving for the administration, which he said was a clear sign that ‘a strategy is missing.’

Republicans countered that the president acted within his constitutional authority as commander in chief. Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., called the War Powers Act ‘an unconstitutional shift of authority from the president,’ arguing Congress retains the ability to restrict funding if it disagrees with military action.

‘We don’t need 535 commanders in chief,’ said Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., arguing against the legislation.

There was also fatigue among some in the GOP over Kaine’s repeated efforts to reassert congressional authority in conflicts.

Republicans privately huddled Tuesday to discuss the strikes and the upcoming war powers vote ahead of their briefing with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair Gen. Dan ‘Raizin’ Caine and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth.

A source familiar with the closed-door discussion told Fox News Digital that Republicans who may have been swayed were frustrated with Kaine’s repeated use of the Senate floor to push resolutions limiting Trump’s war authorities.

Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso, R-Wyo., noted that it was Kaine’s fifth resolution to rein in Trump’s war powers since he returned to office last year, which accounts for nearly half of all war powers resolutions put forward in U.S. history.

‘These resolutions have been used only 11 times in 50 years,’ Barrasso said. ‘The senator from Virginia alone accounts for nearly half of them. Yet Senator Kaine introduced zero war powers resolutions when Barack Obama and Joe Biden were president.’

Rubio told reporters after a briefing with every senator on Tuesday that the administration had complied with the War Powers Act, though it believes the law is unconstitutional and noted that congressional leaders had been notified ahead of the strikes.

Rubio had previously suggested that the U.S. carried out Operation Epic Fury after it became clear that Israel intended to strike Iran first, a point he later walked back.

‘If you tell the President of the United States that if we don’t go first, we’re going to have more people killed and more people injured, the president is going to go first,’ Rubio said. ‘That’s what he did. That’s what the president will always do.’

Meanwhile, U.S. forces have now struck more than 2,000 targets in Iran, largely focusing on taking out the regime’s air defenses and missile capacity. Six U.S. service members have been killed in the operation, as have nearly 50 top Iranian leaders.

The Iranian government claims at least 1,045 people have been killed throughout Iran during the operation.

Related Article

Rubio says in ‘simple English’ Iran run by ‘lunatics,’ defends Trump strike as ‘right decision’
This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
As airstrikes rain down on the Iranian regime, can a fractured opposition unite to lead if it falls?
next post
Walz mocked online after GOP lawmaker floats theory in heated hearing about why Kamala Harris chose him as VP

Related Posts

Trump effect forces Germany to reprioritize defense as...

March 30, 2025

Anti-Iran regime protests grow across country as Trump...

December 31, 2025

Justice Barrett opens up about ‘awkward’ start on...

September 6, 2025

Pro-life movement confronts high abortion rates three years...

June 23, 2025

Looming war powers Senate vote ramps up pressure...

January 14, 2026

Trump admin weighs terrorism sanctions against UN Palestinian...

December 11, 2025

Judicial nominee shuts down ‘wildly inaccurate’ claims that...

June 26, 2025

Iran’s terror proxies, from Iraq to Lebanon, say...

March 1, 2026

World leaders flock to meet with Trump at...

June 26, 2025

DAVID MARCUS: Trump’s Canada tariffs take toll on...

March 11, 2025

    Join our mailing list to get access to special deals, promotions, and insider information. Your exclusive benefits await! Enjoy personalized recommendations, first dibs on sales, and members-only content that makes you feel like a true VIP. Sign up now and start saving!


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Editors’ Picks

    • 1

      Top 11 Countries by Rare Earth Metal Production

      February 27, 2025
    • 2

      Top 10 Copper-producing Companies

      February 12, 2025
    • 3

      Environmental Approval for Boland Infield Studies & Update on Scaled Column ISR Test

      September 19, 2025
    • 4

      Uranium Stocks: 5 Biggest Companies in 2025

      May 20, 2025
    • 5

      Rare Earths Reserves: Top 8 Countries

      February 5, 2025
    • 6

      Capital One outage drags into Friday afternoon, leaving some customers without deposit access

      January 23, 2025
    • 7

      Bank of America CEO says financial industry will jump into crypto payments if regulators allow it

      January 23, 2025
    • About us
    • Contacts
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Email Whitelisting

    Disclaimer: thegreatassets.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2025 thegreatassets.com | All Rights Reserved